Honda CB750 Sandcast

part # for spokes

chrisnoel

  • Full Member
  • ***
    • Posts: 193
    • View Profile
Hello all.

What part #'s should I be looking for to get spoke sets for my rear rim?

Are the spokes for the rolled edge rims the same length ast the spokes for regular rims?

Thier is a parts place in the netherlands that has spoke sets that are reproductions. I think theier name is CMSNL or something like that. Are the spokes they sell acurate?


Steve Swan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 2705
    • View Profile
    • cb750sandcastonly.com
Chris !

Appears you did not make notice of the answers to your question on the other thread YOU opened about this very SAME topic ?

Are you familiarizing yourself with the information contained in the SOOC website ?

The website "cmnsl" you have asked about twice, now, IS (and has been) in "LINKS."

Do you have a HONDA Parts Manual ? If not, I suggest you obtain one. It is a very helpful reference. There may even be a member who would graciously make a xerox copy for you, if you ask

To answer your question about spoke p.n.'s - Referring to my HONDA Parts Manual, print date 7.69; (only the round bead rim was available then)

There are TWO different p.n.'s used for the front wheel & TWO different p.n.'s used for the rear wheel.

In other words, each wheel requires TWO different spokes; an "inner" and an "outer" spoke.

Per 7.69 Parts Manual -

"Spoke A, front (Daido) 44606-300-003"
"Spoke B, front (Daido) 44607-300-003"

"Spoke A, rear (Daido) 42606-300-003"
"Spoke B, rear (Daido) 42607-300-003"

These p.n.'s were available from HONDA last year.

Checking two other HONDA Parts Manuals, (CB750 - K1) & (CB750 - K4). BOTH these manuals call for the same p.n. as the HONDA Parts Manual with a 7.69 print date.

My CB750 1004363 has round lip rim on rear and square lip on front (correct setup). Looking at my sales receipt from Buchanan's their p.n. for rear spokes are KHON711SS. Front spokes - KHON517SS. Stainless steel spokes are a tiny bit more shiny than clear zinc. So, for a perfect 'original' restoration - would not be correct and would appear only very slightly over-restored to only the discriminating eye. Clear zinc dulls time; looses it's brighness. Another plus to stainless spokes - they will not loosen nearly as easily.

Hope this clarifies sufficiently your questions.



chrisnoel

  • Full Member
  • ***
    • Posts: 193
    • View Profile
Thanks. I thought my post didn't make it into the site because I posted the earlier one at school and by the time I got home a few hours later it was not on the site. Now both of them are.

Anyways. I think I will be going with the zinc spokes.

Which ones have the longer end on the hub side? I would assume the longer ended spokes would face inward.
Are the longer ended spokes the A spokes?


Steve Swan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 2705
    • View Profile
    • cb750sandcastonly.com
There are two differences between the two spokes - the angle AND the length of the neck - one neck is 90 degrees and the other neck angle is less acute. The 90 degree angle neck is longer than the less acute angle neck. The HEAD of the 90 degree angle spoke faces to the INSIDE of the hub. The head of the less acute angle spoke faces to the OUTSIDE. When you lace up either wheel, the spokes cannot be fitted to the rim any other way - unless the rim is forced to fit the laced hub.


chrisnoel

  • Full Member
  • ***
    • Posts: 193
    • View Profile
Thanks.

I've laced plenty of bike rims, and a few dirt bike rims, but never a street bike.

I didn't even notice the spokes were not the same till I had a pile of them from two different rims. Till now I thought that one rim must have had the long ended spokes and the other the short. I didn't know which ones had come out of my rolled edge rim.


736cc

  • Jr. Member
  • **
    • Posts: 85
    • View Profile
I laced a set of SS spokes from Buchanans on a sandcast. The construction is much better and much nicer in certain ways. But not exactly correct original but hard to knock. Their nipples were not yellow zinc, they only sold nickel plated or chrome. So I had them send a batch in plain steel then I had them sent out for yellow zinc plating. Buchanan's SS spokes come either plain or polished. I got the plain SS. Every single spoke head comes with an ugly "B" molded on them, so I ground-off every single "B" from 80 spokes. Then the hubs had to be prepped; vapor-blasting then clear-coated w/ Eastwood spray. The original rims had to be chromed. $275 each (ouch  :o ) and 4 months later. Then I laced a set of wheels for the 1st time; and I'm a slow-learner. 1 nipple somehow got lost in all this. Buchanans has about 10 different sizes of nipples, and none yellow zinc plated. More delays and expense. Then new tires and tubes. And bearings. It took about 3 years, $1000+, about 150 hours of fussing to finally getting this all done. Within a week of completion, the bike is sold and gone. Glad I have a pic of them, I hardly had time to enjoy them. And, boy, oh boy, did they look GREAT!!! WHEELS MAKE A CAR OR MOTORCYCLE!   8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8)           


chrisnoel

  • Full Member
  • ***
    • Posts: 193
    • View Profile
I Just bought a set... Well I'm working on the deal anyway. I bought ten, and He is going to sell me 30 more once we work out the details.

My rim is going in the mail tomorow.... The guy got my money order today. I hope it's not too rusty. I did only pay $110.00 with postage for it though. + he's throwing in the coils.

He sent me a better photo than the one in the auction and it looked like it shouldn't have any heavy pitting.


chrisnoel

  • Full Member
  • ***
    • Posts: 193
    • View Profile
I started restoring my spokes. I have already ordered a new set of NOS spokes but I just realized that restoring my old ones is not going to be hard.

I took the old spokes I had from my original rim and a rim I got from the junk yard and picked out 40 of the least ugly ones. I dipped them in vinegar this morning and was quite surprized. I thought at best I would find some pitting that would make them useless, but they are cleaning up pretty nice. What looked like rusy metal was acually just oxidized zink. Several hours in some vinegar and a few rubs with some 0000 steel wool and I have nice looking bare spokes. Some of them still have zinc on them that will need to be stripped before plating. A few of them cleaned up with no damage to the old zinc. It would probably be best to have them all stripped even if they look totaly bare.

I think I'll have them nickel plated, and have the nuts yellowed. Then I'll decide weather to keep the restored or sell them and keep the NOS.


Steve Swan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 2705
    • View Profile
    • cb750sandcastonly.com
Chris, you'll be sorry if you nickle plate those spokes.

1. Nickle begins tarnishing almost immediately and turns ugly fast. I know this from my days of restoring bikes out of the 20's, 30's. Nickle was used before the chrome plating process was invented. Nickle is an inferior finish that tarnishes quickly when in contact, even with in a protected environment.

2. Spokes on the CB750 were "clear" aka "white" zinc plated.

3. The nipples were "yellow" zinc plated.


chrisnoel

  • Full Member
  • ***
    • Posts: 193
    • View Profile
Is thier a better finish than zink? I want them to look acurat. Maybee I should go back to zink hey?


736cc

  • Jr. Member
  • **
    • Posts: 85
    • View Profile
White (clear) zinc correct for fussy resto, but SS doesn't corrode, stronger and looks really nice unpolished. If anybody knocks use of SS spokes because its not-correct, he's a classic example of "sour grapes" and can't see the forrest because of the trees.
Whatever you do, don't polish stock spokes, they look good for a while then start to rust. For instant gratification, you can touch-up a rusty spoke or 2 w/ silver or aluminum paint and a Q-tip. Sounds kinda Mickey Mouse but its quicker, cheaper and less work than re-lacing. Gives more time for riding, too.


Steve Swan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 2705
    • View Profile
    • cb750sandcastonly.com
Chris -

IF YOU WANT THE SPOKES TO LOOK "ACCURATE", HAVE THEM WHITE ZINC PLATED.

THIS WAS AND IS THE CORRECT & ORIGINAL FINISH - YOU CAN'T GET THEM TO LOOK ANY MORE ACCURATE THAN THE ORIGINAL FINISH.

Specialty Plating in Denver does excellent work.

Nickle plate is the coating put on after copper, before final coat of chrome is put on. Chrome is actually a clear layer, that gives nickle it's deep lustre.

New nickle plate is as bright as chrome, but starts turning yellow, then brown ("tarnishes") in a matter of months.

WHY DO YOU WANT TO NICKLE PLATE THE SPOKES WHEN IT IS NOT THE CORRECT FINISH ?


chrisnoel

  • Full Member
  • ***
    • Posts: 193
    • View Profile
It was just a thought. You had my mind changed the first time you said nickle wouldn't work. I didn't know if some sort of dull chrome would hold up better than the zink but have the same look. I'll give specialty a call. Depending on the expense of having them zink plated they may not even be worth restoring.


Steve Swan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 2705
    • View Profile
    • cb750sandcastonly.com
White zinc plate is inexpensive - it is a single layer. Is a single process. Zinc it's self is not as expensive.

Chrome is a "three layer" process - copper, nickle, chrome. These three materials are more expensive than zinc. And, require handling three times.


kp

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 1801
    • View Profile
Hi Fellas, Try this link for a third alternative.
http://www.eplate.com.au/
Not sure if Caswell's have this kit, which is supposedly capable of giving dull or chrome like finish, but the articles on the subject are interesting to say the least. KP  ;)
Yabba Dabba KP